In a recent NYT article of 4/6/11 “More Pupils are Learning Online, Fueling Debate on Quality,” more and more high schools are resorting to classroom instruction provided by computers versus teachers. The proponents of on-line courses in high schools argue that it provides students the computer skills they would need for college where on-line courses are commonly offered. Critics see this as yet another step toward spending less on education by cutting back on teachers and buildings. But does this movement to embrace on-line instruction at such a nascent stage of a student’s learning development adequate preparation for college? What learning is a student really gaining from on-line courses which lack the immediate input and interaction with teachers and fellow students where debate and exchange of ideas fuel critical thinking? In the short run, this may be a cost-effective plan, but in the long run, how will this impact quality? And most importantly, how would this give the US high school and future college graduate the competitive edge needed to succeed in a global economy?
ACEI Global Blog
ACEIGlobal
Search Bar
Categories
Recent Articles
Read related articles
When Numbers Lie: Common GPA Misinterpretations Across Global Education Systems
Why context—not conversion tables—defines academic performance In international credential evaluation, few issues generate as much confusion as GPA interpretation.
6 Jan 2026
No Comments
Venezuela’s Education System in 10 Key Facts: Oversight, Recognition of Universities, and What to Verify
January 6, 2026 With Venezuela currently in the headlines, we would like to focus on “How is education officially structured
6 Jan 2026
No Comments
Understanding Higher Education Recognition and Oversight in Colombia: A Guide for Institutions and Evaluators
January 6, 2026 Colombia has one of the most structured and transparent higher education systems in Latin America—but understanding who
6 Jan 2026
No Comments