In a recent NYT article of 4/6/11 “More Pupils are Learning Online, Fueling Debate on Quality,” more and more high schools are resorting to classroom instruction provided by computers versus teachers. The proponents of on-line courses in high schools argue that it provides students the computer skills they would need for college where on-line courses are commonly offered. Critics see this as yet another step toward spending less on education by cutting back on teachers and buildings. But does this movement to embrace on-line instruction at such a nascent stage of a student’s learning development adequate preparation for college? What learning is a student really gaining from on-line courses which lack the immediate input and interaction with teachers and fellow students where debate and exchange of ideas fuel critical thinking? In the short run, this may be a cost-effective plan, but in the long run, how will this impact quality? And most importantly, how would this give the US high school and future college graduate the competitive edge needed to succeed in a global economy?
ACEI Global Blog
ACEIGlobal
Search Bar
Categories
Recent Articles
Read related articles
Global Talent, Local Standards: Why Credential Evaluation Matters for Executive Search
In today’s borderless business world, executive search firms are being asked to do more than ever before. Clients want leaders
5 Oct 2025
No Comments
Verifying International MBA Credentials for Executive Candidates
In today’s global talent market, the MBA remains one of the most recognized credentials for executive leadership. It signals advanced
5 Oct 2025
No Comments
Executive Search Failures: Why They Happen and What They Cost
Executive search is one of the most high-stakes processes in the business world. Companies invest significant time and money into
5 Oct 2025
No Comments